Prediction of Linda Noskova [33rd] vs Suzan Lamens [69th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L L L W L
Form
W W L W L W L L W WHead-To-Head: Noskova 0 - 0 Lamens
| Noskova | Stats | Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (10-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (12-9) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 33 | Ranking | 69 |
| 25 | Highest Rank | 64 |
| 20 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 8 |
| 65% (157-83) | Career Total W/L | 58% (297-216) |
| $2,054,568 | Career Prize Money | $416,343 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Linda Noskova vs Suzan Lamens Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Noskova 0 - 0 Lamens
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Noskova has won 45.68% of points on their second serve, while Lamens has won 39.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Noskova, in recent form, has won 46.98% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lamens has won 50.87%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.57% and 31.02% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Noskova has saved 43.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lamens has saved 44.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Noskova has won 53.33% of matches played (W/L 24/ 21), with Lamens winning 58.21% (W/L 39/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Noskova has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 76% (W/L 44/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6). Lamens has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 184/ 119), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Noskova has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 65.22% of matches (W/L 15/ 8), where as Lamens has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 60% of matches (W/L 18/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Noskova has played against opponents with an average rank of 128.93 while Lamens has played against players with an average rank of 202.06.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Noskova has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lamens has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Noskova has converted 37.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lamens has converted 36.79% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Linda Noskova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 |
Stats 
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Linda Noskova
111%
(
70 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
124%
(
61 of
49)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Linda Noskova
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lulu Sun
Player
Linda Noskova
41%
(
23 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Linda Noskova
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
9
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Jessica Pegula
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Diana Shnaider
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
16
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
6
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(8) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Yulia Putintseva
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Linda Noskova
63%
(
68 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
91)
4
Aces
16
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(1) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Yulia Putintseva
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Katie Boulter
106%
(
69 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tatjana Maria
117%
(
70 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Suzan Lamens
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Marie Bouzkova
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Suzan Lamens
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
102)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
50 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Muchova
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Shuai Zhang
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Daria Saville
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
11
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Noskova vs Lamens?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Noskova Vs Lamens is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (157/83) | Win/Loss | 58% (297/216) |
| 62% (347/215) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (658/516) |
| 54% (2843/2469) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5658/5023) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 880 | Aces Total | 833 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.47 |
| 983 | Total Double Faults | 2423 |
| 1:36:54 | Average Match Time | 1:29:8 |
| 224.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 275.14 |
| 61% (10622/17432) | 1st Serve % | 59% (18056/30682) |
| 67% (7117/10622) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (11134/18009) |
| 47% (3198/6810) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (5413/12698) |
| 47% (909/1932) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (2079/4089) |
| 43% (7404/17030) | Return Points Win % | 48% (14798/30809) |
| 66% (156/238) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (294/509) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 61% (46/75) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (47/95) |
| 60% (49/82) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (84/150) |
| 88% (155/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (271/245) |
| 12% (155/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (271/26) |
| 25% (85/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (242/52) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Linda Noskova
View full predicted draw for Noskova in Rouen
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Suzan Lamens
View full predicted draw for Lamens in Rouen
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
